One of the reasons I thinned out the lists of “friends” on social networking sites recently is that some, in their profile, listed themselves as “spiritual” and would write updates that drove me insane. It was like a daily dose of intellectual anesthetic. It’s not that thinking of ourselves as spiritual is incorrect. We are spiritual beings in a physical body, this is true. It’s just the idea that listing one’s religion as “spiritual”, or referring to oneself as someone who writes about “spirituality”, has traditionally annoyed me.
I understand the desire to shun restrictive religious titles, but spiritual? What does that even mean, anyway?
If I don’t have religion, but am spiritual, does that mean when someone cuts me off in traffic, instead of hollering “God Bless You!” or a comment about karma, I instead offer up a more abstract “F**k you!” with higher quality adverbs? Am I making up a personal philosophy on the fly each day? Am I grabbing six books off of the featured spirituality table at Barnes and Noble and combining the whole lot? If you’re “spiritual”, do you believe in anything? Is it a mere acknowledgement that there’s a higher power out there, but you don’t need 12 steps to admit it?
To me, it seems it’s a way of saying you believe in something, but you don’t want to be pinned down just in case you want to change it up tomorrow. This is a belief in nothing.
The most difficult for me to stomach are Christians who claim to write about “spirituality.” This means they are going to highlight Jesus and his anti-religious-establishment actions and efforts at religious exclusivity, and ignore such things as his admonishment to cut off your hand if it caused you to sin. Romans 3:23 is not going to work if we are god-within.
Why is that the only Jesus they write about?
We love the Jefferson Bible because it shuts Paul up, forgetting that Jesus had some hard, hard teachings.
It’s nice to think of Social Justice Jesus, or the Endless Grace For All Sexual and Relational Sins Jesus, or the Religious Hypocrites and Exclusiveness Is Bad Jesus, or even the He Never Talked About Such-and-Such A Topic So It’s Not A Sin Jesus — all popular — but the No Wait, Sin Really Is A Seriously Big Deal Jesus is not so fun.
And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell. – Matthew 5:30
What we have there is sin, removal, and the mention of hell. What we have there is the up-front acknowledgment that yeah, you might have to do without something you really think you need in this life because there is an eternity at stake that is much more important. Both hands would be nice but I may have to do without, even if everyone else gets to keep their hands. It might not seem fair. Fit that into your Jesus Was A Great Prophet/Man Whatever Makes Me Happy As Long As I Am Concerned About Social Justice Rodney King Nailed It and I Write About Spirituality essay of the week.
Somebody got nailed, that’s for sure, and it was for much more than because we couldn’t all get along. The crucifixion is hard to write about if you tiptoe around sin.
There are a lot of things we just don’t want to cut off. I would be in favor of removing the dominant writing hands of the merely “spiritual”, however, and turning their pens over to the atheists. At least they know the Bible.
Don’t just be “spiritual” and figure that’s good enough. All that does is sell scented candles and journals to gullible women 30 minutes after Oprah goes off the air. I want to tell you to believe in Jesus, but right now I’m sort of falling down the rabbit hole so I’m not a great example.

Thanks Julie for pointing out truth on both sides while staying authentic.
Good post over all.
My FB friends are mostly conservatives, so I have to deal with the Republican/American/Fundamentalist/Calvinistic/Condemning Jesus wagging his finger and waving the American flag in the status updates.
My solution? I just hide their news feeds. Their status updates get me triggered, and there is no point of trying to engage them over Facebook or the Internet as a medium to discuss serious subjects. Defrending them seems too harsh.
I was sooo tempted to post this status, but chickened out. May I post it here?
“Seek ye first the Christian America and His rightwing politics.”
Please don’t de-friend me.
But even if you do, I know where to find you. Bwahahahaha
David, you’re a nut.
I can’t de-friend you.
Plus, you’ve gone over to the Dark Side (cat ownership).
The whole Facebook “Hide” thing as far as hiding the actual status updates of people made little sense to me. I get hiding the annoying games and stuff, but if you have a person on your list and you don’t visit their page and don’t want to hear what they say on your opening page, wouldn’t it just be better to remove them? What is the purpose of keeping them on your list?
Twitter is the worst. I trimmed that down, too, because of sponsored tweets and the FourSquare stuff — that gets old fast. I just don’t want to read inanity anymore. There’s no “hide” in Twitter. It’s either on the list or not.
A very nice (I know you hate that word) rant you have there. Your castigation skills are in fine order this morning. :^) Of course, this is one of the reasons many of us love you . . . you force us to confront things we would rather not deal with.
Think of it as standing behind a loud speaker. They hear me, but I can’t hear them. I’ve rendered them voiceless and myself all powerful and all knowing. They’ve become unknowingly my minions.